The Right to Write

Tuesday, 4 December 2007, 4:00 | Category : Inspiration, Writing
Tags :

What is a writer? Is it someone who makes a living writing? Is it someone who has been published? Or is it just someone who writes? And when I say “someone who writes,” I don’t mean that everyone who writes a grocery list should be accused of being a writer. I mean people who write purposefully, whether they have aspirations of publication or not.

I don’t tend to make these distinctions, but if asked, I say that I’m an amateur writer. I certainly don’t have the presumption to compare myself to famous writers of the past, or even to anyone who’s published, but I still think I’m a writer, albeit an amateur one.

I’ve been thinking about the meaning of being a writer today, because I’ve just been reading 101 Reasons to Stop Writing and trying to decide if I’m offended or not. I think Sean Lindsay has some good points. Far too many people think of the “wealth and fame” they’ll have when they’re published long before they even have a first draft. And there are probably far too many bad books published. But I couldn’t help but wonder: who’s tying this poor man down and making him buy and read all these terrible books? Publishing, like all businesses, is market driven. If there are bad books being published, it’s probably because there are people who will buy them.

Lindsay also criticizes NaNoWriMo pretty severely. Like many people who disparage NaNo, I think he’s trying too hard. Yes, judging by the NaNo forums, some participants think they will have a complete novel, ready to send to publishers, by the end of the month. But many serious writers also use the adrenaline from NaNo’s forced pace to increase the time they spend writing or to help them work toward a goal. And many participants just write because it’s fun, challenging, and an exercise in creativity. True, the emphasis on writing “crap” is perhaps overdone in the NaNo promotional literature, but the larger point is to overcome inhibitions and take creative risks. And most participants understand that what they have at the end of NaNo is an extremely rough draft.

So what does this have to do with the definition of “writer”? When I’m confronted with the idea that I should just stop writing if I’m not good enough to be a bestselling author, I feel the need to reinforce the validity of writing as an amateur, for fun. Why should anyone who enjoys writing stop? The idea seems comparable to saying that those who bicycle for fun should stop unless they’re good enough to compete in the Tour de France. Or that the people who play instruments in the community band should stop if they have no future as professional musicians. There’s no shame in pursuing an activity just for fun.

So although I agree with some of Lindsay’s reasons, he hasn’t convinced me to stop writing. What about you?

Thanks for reading - CSS
Share and Enjoy:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Google

5 Comments for “The Right to Write”

  1. 1Ariel

    On your opening question: I define author as anyone who has written something creative, whether it be good or bad. That’s what editing is for, which brings me to my next point.

    Sean Lindsay criticizes NaNoWriMo because he claims that no one can write anything worth reading in 30 days. Maybe not. But that’s where revision and editing come in, after November. Some people may think that they can come out of NaNoWriMo with a complete novel, but realistic people know that they can just get their ideas down on paper (or text documents) and clean it up later.

    I think that his main reasoning (that no one should write unless they’re the next Dickens) is illogical. How are we supposed to get any new literary geniuses if no one even tries? Saying that you shouldn’t try to write unless you’re going to be amazing isn’t practical and it doesn’t make sense.

    Basically, he has failed in his attempt to stop me from writing. I don’t write to be famous. I don’t write because I want to make lots of money. I write because I can’t not write, because it’s my passion. That’s all.

  2. 2CSS

    Glad to hear that, Ariel. I definitely prefer the advice from Deep Genre: “If you can quit, do.”

    In other words, don’t write unless you’re passionate about it and just can’t stop yourself.

    Thanks for your insightful comment.

  3. 3Robert Hruzek

    I’m with Ariel, here - I write because I can’t NOT write. Only reader response tells me if I’m doing a passable job or not.

    Besides, who is anyone to tell me I’ll “never make money” from it?

  4. 4CSS

    Whenever I wonder if I’m really suited to be a writer, I think about all the times I’ve stopped–and then picked it back up again because I just can’t keep myself away. I guess I never learn :)

  5. 5Zan

    Hi!
    I know this is about a year late, but I stumbled upon Mr. Lindsay’s rant, and found your site from there. Thank you. I think he has entirely missed the point of polish, and learning, Polish what you have, and learn from what you’ve done right (and, especially, wrong). He sounds very bitter… and you can never succeed at something if you don’t try. I’m glad that Edison, Ford and the Wright brothers didn’t have that mentality. Anyway, I’m going to go rabbit holing in your blog now!

Leave a comment